Sheriff Hakes Responds

Sheriff Hakes Responds

As there continues to be activity swirling around Chippewa County and the future of Sheriff Hakes, he has offered the following in response to the allegations around him. Read the full response below:


October 5, 2023
Several issues have been raised by the allegations of the so-called investigative report recently
provided to me in redacted form when it was also released to the public. I have also released to
the public my responses to the report. I realize that the report and my responses are lengthy, and
unfortunately the report contains many inaccurate statements and innuendos that have been
exploited by some politicians for their own agendas. I take this opportunity to set the record
straight as to several of the sections of the report. The fact that I do not address all of them does
not mean that matters not discussed are accurate, but only means the report is so full of
inaccuracies there is simply not time nor space to address them all. Please consider the

  1. No specific, written formal complaint was or has ever been filed against me by the former
    adult employee referenced in the report. While I did speak with county representatives generally
    about the matter it was always a moving target and as such difficult to respond to. The proof that
    there has never been such a complaint is found in the fact that not even a redacted version of one
    was provided to the public or to me when the report was released.
    2.Contrary to the derogatory implications of the report, no sexually explicit photos or
    solicitations were ever sent by me on my phone to anyone, including the adult who once was an
    employee of Chippewa County. Proof that none exists is found in the fact that not even a
    redacted version of such items is included in the released report and its exhibits.
    3.Since I was sworn in as sheriff, I have not had a single real estate transaction with any member
    of the sheriff’s office or any county employee, and if any have asked me about real estate, I have
    offered to provide them free help in finding a realtor.
    4.Prior to being sworn in as sheriff, like many peace officers, I did off-duty work and had side
    businesses to help provide for my family. Since being sworn in as sheriff I have had little time or
    interest in doing them, and my expected gross income for 2023 will be significantly less than it
    was in 2022. I did not run for sheriff for the money or glory of the title but to serve the public.
    That has not and will not change.

Chippewa County Sheriff’s Office
Travis Hakes, Sheriff Curt Dutton, Chief Deputy

32 East Spruce Street Chippewa Falls, WI 54729-2542
Phone: (715) 726-7701 FAX: (715) 723-6471

  1. Any sale of items such as coffee mugs or knives to the staff of the sheriff’s office since I
    became sheriff have actually been at a financial loss to me and I have not profited a single dime
    from those few sales.
  2. There was no conflict of interest in how the Sheriff’s Office acquired needed equipment in the
    form of customized rifles, and I made no money on their acquisition. This equipment was so
    important for our office to have that I was prepared to pay $4,800 of my personal money if
    necessary to acquire it, which I could legally do as a federally licensed firearms dealer and as a
    donation to the Sheriff’s Office. Fortunately, or perhaps because of my direct involvement as
    sheriff, we were able to get the rifles in an expedited manner and my donation was not needed.
  3. A sheriff does not get paid by the hour and work a set shift but is on duty 24/7/365, so any
    discussion about me working shifts, being in the office or not being in the office, or where you
    might find me in the county simply demonstrates a lack of understanding of what a sheriff does
    or worse yet a conscious attempt to present a derogatory image of me for political reasons. I do
    not get a day off, and even when I take time to be with my family modern technology allows me
    to stay in touch with my office. For example, I once approved a time sensitive promotion of a
    staff member while on a family outing.
  4. Chippewa County is a venue for concert events that bring in extensive revenues to our local
    businesses and economy. I fully support our business community and I also want to keep our
    citizens and concert goers safe at the least possible cost to the taxpayers. Criticism that I entered
    into a “contract” for cab services to take people from Rock Fest are simply not true. I conferred
    with several sources on how to deal with evicted concert goers to come up with a way to avoid
    taking them to jail and giving them an arrest record for simply being drunk, while also not
    wasting deputy time being a cab driver or a babysitter. The result, which some have called a
    “contract” did not spend a dime of tax money and the entire bill of about $75.00 was paid by the
    concert promoter. This was a creative public and private partnership that kept everyone safe at no
    cost to taxpayers and helped our local economy by providing a safe concert environment. This is
    what “community policing” is all about.
  5. It is correct that I declined to be interviewed by attorney Hall. I elected not to do so after she
    made it clear that her intent was to question me about official sheriff office matters far removed
    from the original purpose she was retained with tax dollars to investigate. She apparently was
    directed by county officials to explore matters over which administration has no authority, and
    therefore that would simply waste tax dollars and be used for a set agenda to develop negative
    information about me. The report that was issued demonstrates that my perceptions were
    accurate. I was further advised by some people who had been interviewed that her approach was
    hostile, confrontational and in search of negative information. At no time have I declined to work directly with county administration, human resources or the county board regarding the matter that was the starting cause of this investigation.
  1. Implications that how a threat to the courts was handled that implies improper response could
    not be further from the truth. The specifics of the multi-layer approach that was used is
    something I will not disclose, lest it become a guide for future domestic terrorists that seek to do
    harm to our courthouse or the court. I will simply state there was a coordinated response
    involving many law enforcement entities and the fact nothing bad happened showed that what
    we did worked. The fact that some people that were interviewed did not know of the security
    plan put into place only shows that security plans are often discussed on a need-to-know basis,
    and those people simply did not need to know.
  2. Allegations concerning a pursuit in which I was involved that imply fault on my actions are
    equally misplaced. If one reviews the facts and written report that was generated with a trained
    eye of an experienced officer, that trained eye would reveal the propriety of my actions on that
    date in dealing with this potentially dangerous suspect and the fact my actions were consistent
    with state pursuit guidelines. This pursuit was widely reported on, as it resulted in two of our
    patrol vehicles being damaged, and the pursuit went across the entire county. Had another
    member of this office done what I did they would not be subject to criticism or discipline by me
    or my office.
  3. This report incorrectly depicts that I treated a single employee differently than the rest of our
    staff. Media reports suggest that I invited only a single employee to certain events, when all
    employees were invited. In fact, when our Office went to mourn the losses of fellow Law
    Enforcement, I personally contacted the Holcombe School District bus company and offered to
    pay for a bus to transport of our members at my own expense. The bus company donated the
    transportation. The “investigator” in fact interviewed people who provided information such as
    this, but she knowingly omitted it from her “report” to perpetuate the idea of me favoring a
    single employee.
    The taxpayers have spent an untold amount of money to pay for what appears to be a politically
    motivated and result-oriented report that contains inaccurate and incomplete information that
    appears to be written with the intent to maximize any hint or innuendo of misconduct. I will not
    comment on nor complain about my treatment, as I well knew this type of action could happen
    when I swore to uphold the constitution and protect the people of Chippewa County. I am
    saddened because our citizens deserve better from county officials and their agents. Any time I
    am forced to choose between we the people or we the government, I will always choose the
    people I took an oath to protect.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *